CX
CBNX ASIA Co., Ltd.

Tongyeong CASP
Coke Project
Investor Summary Report

Modular · Scalable · Eco-Friendly CASP Coke Manufacturing Platform
Phase 1: 1,000,000 Tons/Year  |  Funding Request: USD 1.5 Billion

Location
Tongyeong, Korea
Report Date
April 20, 2026
Classification
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
Phase 1 Revenue
$454M
Annual
EBITDA
$262M
Margin 58%
Phase 1 EV
$1.9–2.5B
EV/EBITDA 6–10x
Global EV
$25–40B
At 45M tons/yr

1. Project Overview

CBNX ASIA is the exclusive Asian representative of CBNX Group LLC's CASP technology, building a next-generation low-carbon coke facility in Tongyeong, Korea.

CASP (Carbon Alloy Synthesis Process) is a continuous-flow technology replacing conventional batch coke ovens, commercially validated through Alpha (10,000 t/yr) and Beta (50,000 t/yr) demonstration plants in Ardmore, Oklahoma, USA.

This project constructs a 1,000,000 tons/year coke production facility with 3 CASP modules (330,000 tons each) and integrated co-generation (90 MWh) in Tongyeong, Gyeongsangnam-do. Total funding request: USD 1.5 billion.

Korea's metallurgical coke demand (~25M tons/yr), major offtakers (POSCO, Hyundai Steel), and alignment with the 2050 Carbon Neutrality Policy form the strategic foundation.

Capacity
1,000,000 t/yr
3 CASP Modules
Site Area
107.5 ha
Coastal industrial
Co-Generation
90 MWh
Waste heat recovery
Total CAPEX
$1.5B
USD 1.5 Billion

2. CASP Technology Advantage

Structural superiority across all metrics: yield, cost, emissions, and labor efficiency.

MetricCASPConventionalImprovement
Production Yield98–99%88–90%+10%p
Coal Input / ton coke1.35 tons1.55 tons▼ 13%
CO₂ Emissions60% of baseline100% baseline▼ 40%
Labor (per 1M tons)~100 staff~250 staff▼ 60%
EPA ClassificationMinor SourceMajor SourceEased regulation
Process TypeContinuousBatchHigher uptime

CASP vs Conventional — Relative Comparison (Conventional = 100)

Yield
99
vs 89
Coal Efficiency
87
vs 100
CO₂ Emissions
60
vs 100
Labor Required
40
vs 100
Energy Use
65
vs 100

Lower = better for CO₂, Labor, Energy — CASP shows 35–60% improvement

3. Phase 1 Financial Outlook

Steady-state revenue $454M, EBITDA $262M. Margin of 57.7% far exceeds industry average (20–35%). Excludes carbon credits, subsidies, ESG premiums.

Annual Revenue
$454M
Coke $400M + Power $54M
EBITDA
$262M
Margin 57.7%
Net Income
$151M
Corp. tax 21%
DSCR
1.30x
Debt Service Coverage

Revenue → EBITDA Bridge (USD Millions)

$454M
Total
Revenue
-$220M
Raw Coal
-$45M
Production
-$4M
Admin
+$77M
Deprec.
$262M
EBITDA

P&L Structure

ItemUSD MNote
Coke Sales$400.01M tons × $400/ton
Power Sales$54.090MWh × $80/MWh
Total Revenue$454.0
Raw Coal Cost($220.0)1.35M tons × $220/ton
Production Cost($45.0)$40/ton + consumables
Admin & Maintenance($4.0)$2/ton × 2
EBIT$185.0Operating profit
Depreciation Add-back+$77.0CAPEX amortization
EBITDA$262.0Margin 57.7%

4. Valuation

Two-stage framework: Sum-of-Parts (pre-revenue) → EV/EBITDA (operational). Comparable: Sun Coke Energy (SXC) at 5.8x, adjusted upward for ESG + tech premium.

StageCapacityLow CaseMid CaseHigh Case
Pre-Money (Current)0$40M$75M$110M
Phase 1 (Operational)1M tons/yr$1.57B$2.10B$2.62B
Phase 3 (Domestic)3M tons/yr$6.29B$7.07B$7.86B
Global Expansion45M tons/yr$25B$32B$40B

Enterprise Value Growth Trajectory (USD Billions)

$0.11B
Pre-Money
$2.62B
Phase 1
$7.86B
Phase 3
$40B
Global

High Case shown — Pre-Money $110M → Phase 1 $2.5B = ~25× uplift

💡 Key Investor Takeaway
Pre-Money max $110M → Phase 1 operational $2.5B represents ~20–25× value uplift. Global expansion offers up to 360× upside. Asset-backed downside protection with asymmetric return profile driven by execution milestones.

5. 10-Year Global Expansion Strategy

Korea → UAE → Southeast Asia. Linear scaling via module replication with zero scale-up risk.

MarketTarget SupplyEst. Revenue (10yr)Entry Timing
Korea (Domestic)25M tons$8.75BYear 1~
UAE10M tons$3.50BYear 5–8
Vietnam4M tons$1.40BYear 8–10
Indonesia4M tons$1.40BYear 8–10
Malaysia2M tons$0.70BYear 8–10
Total45M tons$15.75B

Target Supply by Market (Million Tons)

Korea
25M
25
UAE
10M
10
Vietnam
4M
4
Indonesia
4M
4
Malaysia
2M
2

6. Capital Structure & Financing

Total USD 1.5B request. Senior Debt 60–70% / Equity 30–40% hybrid project finance structure.

CAPEX Allocation

ItemUSD MShare
CASP Modules (3)$75052%
Land Acquisition$30021%
Plant & Utilities$20014%
Co-Generation$957%
Working Capital$503%
Contingency$503%
Total$1,445100%

CAPEX Distribution

$1.5B Total
Modules $750M
Land $300M
Plant $200M
Co-Gen $95M
WC + Cont. $100M

Financing Structure

ComponentRatioAmount
Senior Debt60–70%$900M–$1,050M
Equity (Sponsor / Strategic)30–40%$450M–$600M

Repayment & Exit

ParameterDetail
Construction Period~3 years
Grace Period5 years (3 construction + 2 ramp-up)
Repayment Tenor15 years
DSCR Target~1.30x
StructureSPV (Limited Recourse)
Exit PathwaysDividend / Strategic Sale / IPO / Licensing

Key Patents

Patent NumberDescriptionDate
US 7,150,627 B2Pre-Furnace Reactor (PFR)Dec 19, 2006
US 8,110,169 B2CASP Full-Process TechnologyFeb 7, 2012